Centralized Money Systems
"The few who understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so dependant on its favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863 |  |
Centralised money systems gather all the decision making in a single place.
They therefore require the highest ethical standards from their operators.
In the light of this, it may seem strange that they are run by unelected,
largely unaccountable businessmen, whose actions are obscured by laws to protect the
anonymous nature of modern money.
"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States" Senator Barry Goldwater
The origins of money lie in exchanges (and especially,
gifts) within a local community. Money circulated within a
locality, amongst people who knew and cared for one another, much as it does in today's
community currency systems.
As nation states formed, these were gradually replaced by national currencies,
in which money assumed a more
anonymous role.
It began to be issued centrally, under the authority of a king or other absolute ruler.
In 1694, an enterprising group of private financiers obtained a royal
charter to start the Bank of England. In exchange for financing the
government in times of war, they were granted the first national monopoly
over the creation of money. It was highly lucrative.
As
capitalism was spread worldwide, privately controlled central banks
were set up along similar lines, effectively monopolising issuance of credit within a country.
Control of the money system ensured not just huge profits from
interest, but also huge profits from the ability to
inflate the money supply, engineering predictable economic booms and busts.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
In USA, however, the situation was different. The importance of sound money was well understood
after a series of high profile bank failures in the late 19th century.
Control of the United States' money system was the subject not only of heated debate, but of intrigue and assassinations.
 | "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson, US President |
After a pitched political battle, the interests of private capital triumphed in 1913, when
a private credit monopoly in USA was granted as the Federal Reserve Act was passed into law.
This created the Federal Reserve, the largest and most influential of the central banks -
sold to the American public as a means to provide economic stability.
The system of central banks has proved a remarkably long-lasting political expediency,
and its beneficiaries have used a mixture of strategies to divert attention away from its means of operation.
A few groups, such as
Prosperity UK
have publicly questioned the system of central banks, calling for the profits from credit to be
given back to the taxpayer.
We are conceiving a more far reaching change to the
money system - the implementation of a fully decentralized,
friend-2-friend
gift economy.
Alternatives to Centralised Banking:
| Downloads | Title | Author(s) | Date |    | AE204: Avoiding Centralised Money | Robin Upton | 2005-10-01 |
|